由实证研究的结果,我们发现:
①大多数三年级和五年级的小学生都处于多元论阶段,体现出一定辩论技能,尤其在社会领域;
②从三年级到五年级的绝对主义者变少,而评价主义者增多,体现了发展变化,辩论技能也是五年级有所增长;
③个人喜好或价值判断领域的认识论信念水平和辩论技能有负相关;
④合作情境使得三年级学生对个人喜好的认识向绝对化发展,对价值领域的认识促进不如个人情境,但对三年级和五年级科学辩论任务的表现都有所促进。
总的来说,合作辩论对科学辩论任务的表现有促进作用,但对社会辩论任务促进不大。由于社会辩论任务其实包含价值判断,是“应不应该”的问题,所以这个结果和合作辩论对三年级学生价值判断领域的个体认识论水平的影响可以结合来看。合作辩论使得小学生,尤其是低年级的小学生对价值判断的问题更倾向形成绝对化的信念(也许和群体极化有关),这一影响可能会阻碍合作辩论对社会辩论任务的促进。未来研究应充分考虑领域差异、发展阶段,在此前提下进一步考察合作辩论对个体认识论信念和辩论技能,甚至对审辩思维能力的影响。
摘要Abstract
Personal Epistemology was considered related to argumentation skills, which could be enhanced by collaborative argumentation.Previous studies have shown that children are able to differentiate and evaluate argumentation at an early age.They can also benefit from collaborative argumentation.Results of our study showed that collaborative argumentation influenced the personal epistemology in value area and the performance in argumentation task on scientific topics.It has implication on our understanding of the development of personal epistemology and argumentation skills as well as the facilitation of related beliefs and skills.
Keywords
collaborative argumentation, personal epistemology, argumentation skills
参考文献Reference
Baum, L.A., Danovitch, J.H.& Keil, F.C.(2007).Children’s sensitivity to circular explanations.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 100(2), 146-155.
Doise, W., Mugny, G.& Perret-Clermont (1976).Social interaction and cognitive development: Further evidence.European Journal of Social Psychology, 6, 245-247.
Golanics, J.D.& Nussbaum, E.M.(2008).Enhancing collaborative online argumentation through question elaboration and goal instructions.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 167-180.
Greene, J.A., Torney-Purta, J.& Azevedo, R.(2010).Empirical evidence regarding relations among a model of epistemic and ontological cognition, academic performance, and educational level.Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 234-255.
Franco, G.M., Muis, K.R., Kendeou, P., Ranellucci, J., Sampasivam, L.& Wang, X.H.(2012).Examining the influences of epistemic beliefs and knowledge representations on cognitive processing and conceptual change when learning physics.Learning and Instruction, 22, 62-77.
Hofer, B.& Pintrich, P.(2002).Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing.Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Keefer, M.W., Zeitz, C.M.& Resnick, L.B.(2000).Judging the quality of peer-led student dialogues.Cognition and Instruction, 18,53-81.
Kuhn, D.(1991).The skills of argument.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.doi:10.1017/CBO9780511571350.
Kuhn, D., Cheney, R.& Weinstock, M.(2000).The development of epistemological understanding.Cognitive Development, 15, 309-328.
Kuhn, D.& Park, S.(2005).Epistemological understanding and the development of intellectual values.International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 111-124.
Kuhn, D.& Udell, W.(2007).Coordinating own and other perspectives in argument.Thinking and Reasoning, 13, 90 -104.
Kuczynski, L.(1982).Intensity and orientation of reasoning: motivational determinants of children’s compliance to verbal rationales.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 34(3), 357.
LaVoie, J.C.(1974).Cognitive determinants of resistance to deviation in seven-, nine-, and eleven-year-old children of low and high maturity of moral judgment.Developmental Psychology, 10(3), 393-403.
Mason, L.& Boscolo, P.(2004).Role of epistemological understanding and interest in interpreting a controversy and in topic-specific belief change.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 103-128.
Mason, L., Boldrin, A.& Zurlo, G.(2006).Epistemological understanding in different judgment domains: Relationships with gender, grade level, and curriculum.International Journal of Educational Research, 45, 43-56.
Mercier,H.(2011).Reasoning serves argumentation in children.Cognitive Development,26,177-191.
Nussbaum, E.M.: Collaborative Discourse, Argumentation, and Learning: Preface and Literature Review.Contemporary Educational Psychology 33(3), 345-359.
O’Keefe, D.J.(1982).The concept of argument and arguing.In J.R.Cox & C.A.Willard (Eds.), Advances in argumentation theory and research (pp.3-23).Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Orsolini, M.(1993).“Dwarfs do not shoot”: An analysis of children’s justifications.Cognition and Instruction, 11(3),281-297.
Orsolini, M.& Pontecorvo, C.(1992).Children’s talk in classroom discussions.Cognition and Instruction, 9(2), 113-136.
Perret-Clermont, A.-N.(1980).Social interaction and cognitive development in children.London: Academic Press.
Perret-Clermont, A.-N., Carugati, F.& Oates, J.(2004).A socio-cognitive perspective on learning and cognitive development.InJ.Oates & A.Grayson (Eds.), Cognitive and language development in children (pp.303-332).London: The Open University &Blackwell Publishing.
Sandoval, W.A.(2005).Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry.Science Education, 89, 634-656.
Schommer, M.& Easter, M.(2006).Ways of knowing and epistemological beliefs: Combined effect on academic performance.Educational Psychology, 26, 411-423.
Stein, N.L.& Bernas, R.(1999).The early emergence of argumentative knowledge and skill.In J.Andriessen, & P.Coirier (Eds.),Foundations of argumentative text processing (pp.97-116).Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Walker, C.M., Wartenberg, T.E.& Winner, E.(2013).Engagement in philosophical dialogue facilitates children’s reasoning about subjectivity.Developmental Psychology, 49(7): 1338-1347.
Wang,X., Zhou, J.& Shen,J.(2014).Personal epistemology across different judgment domains: effects of grade level and school curriculum, Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology.
Weinstock, M.& Zviling-Beiser, H.(2009).Separating academic and social experience as potential factors in epistemological development.Learning and Instruction, 19, 287-298.
Yang, Y.Y.& Tsai, C.-C.(2010).Reasoning about science-related uncertain issues and epistemological perspectives among children.Instructional Science, 38, 325-354.
[1] 北京师范大学心理学院
[2] 美国传腾国际大学